Compare and Contrast two poems bringing out and explaining each poet’s attitude Essay

Compare and railway line two poems bringing out and explaining separately poets attitude to capital of the United Kingdom, and commenting on the differences and akinities in the way they write.In this following essay I will be comparing, contrasting and analysing two poems written in the nineteenth Century by two poets. The two poems that I will be analysing are called capital of the United Kingdom and Upon Westminster Bridge written by William Wordsworth and William Blake.William Wordsworth was an English poet painter, innate(p)(p) on November 28th, 1757. Blake spent the majority of his quiet life on the grey Coast of England from 1800-1803. The exception of which was a short visit to Felpham. He died in 1827 at the age of 70.Like Blake, Wordworth was an English Romantic poet. He was born(p) on April 7th, 1770 Wordsworth spent most of his life in the Lake District.In London, Blake talks about(predicate) his disgust for London and how he finds a sure amount of sympathy for i ts inhabitants.In the first stanza Blake says I wander thro each charterd street. This gives the subtraction that the city is a encompass maze of streets and alleys. By using the password wander to describe his journey, the implication this has is that it is as though he was walking aimlessly through with(predicate) the city. It makes the contributor see London through the eyes of Blake. Using this with the pronoun I makes it so much more of a personal encounter, and as the endorser sees it through his eyes it is for them too.The effect that all of this has on the reader is that they feel as though Blake thought that there was no-where in London that was worthwhile visiting, show how negative his feelings were towards the city.The word charterd is repeated, this is done to remind the reader of the commercial nature of the city in the way that everything is owned. This is also stress on the next line of the stanza when Blake says, where the charterd Thames does flow. This is implying that thus far the river is owned. The river can be interpreted as a symbol-life. Following a path set out for us, but only he finds impression along his way, again, showing the reader that he has lost a sure amount of faith in the city.In the same stanza he says And judge in every face I meet, by this he federal agency that he is able to see the depression in the city, caused by poverty, greed among other things, all of which are effecting the rich and the poor. He repeats the word find out to reinforce the point that everywhere he is looking he can see symbolic label. The use of the term mark also has another meaning, one of impurity, sins and scars, (which can be linked with comments subsequent on in the poem). In this Blake may be using his proficiency of language to tell how, in his opinion, everybody in London is to blame for the condition, which it is was in.He comes from a lower middle class background the son of a hosier and the tone of this poem expresses h is awareness of the poverty around him marks of weakness, marks of woes.By using repetition in the first stanza, Blake makes the reader feel that as he walks thro each charterd street he is viewing images that sicken him.In the second stanza, Blake is reminding the reader how the depression is change every man. Again he uses the technique of repletion to punctuate the word every reinforcing the idea of collectiveness and blame for the whole city. This reminds the reader that cryptograph is able to escape the conditions of the depression.In this stanza Blake talks about ever babes cry of fear. This is suggesting that the children are afraid of what they have been born into, and fearing that there is no hope whatsoever for the future. Blake goes on to talk about this when he says that they have an almost certain chance of becoming lamp chimney sweeps or prostitutes, before the age of twelve. By describing it like this Blake succeeds in majestic and depressing the reader. It is her e too that he plays on the concept of childishness innocence. By mentioning the children here he evokes the concept of innocence but it is humourous that this poem contains no innocence of its own, at all. This suggests to the reader how real desperate the children are,Blake suggests and blames the citizens of London for the state that it is in. He describes, mind forgd manacles. This means that the only thing that is preventing the people from living happy lives is their negative and depressive shipway of thinking.In the third stanza, Blake makes reference to the Chimney-sweepers cry. At the sequence he wrote this poem, young children, especially young boys, were sent up chimneys to neat them. Many got trapped and died there. By reminding the reader of these conditions he makes the reader take a leak how horrific these events were. In this he tries to emphasise what a terrible step up London was.Blake links the sweepers to the church building when he says Every blackning c hurch apalls. He is saying that the church is tainting themselves by not defending the chimney-sweepers. By involving the church in this whole affair Blake brings to sight how deep this kitchen range of corruption went with regards to authority. The coupling of the words church and apalls also has a similar effect, as they are two contrasting words. Blake simply means that the church is no full filling its role to comfort the needy and is or else turning a blind eye on the suffering. Blake believes that the church was vocalization of the reason London was in such a state.